The Great Reset

[Atte Saarela]

Moni valtio saa velkaantumisensa ihan sillä kurinn että rikkain 20% laitetaan maksamaan veroja. Tekisi melkein mieli ruveta spekuloimaan sillä että ovatko nämä salaliitot itsessään salaliitto jolla saadaan sumuverho sille, mitä oikeasti tehdään.

Niin, rikkaiden veroaste tulee varmaan nousemaan, mutta aika paljon heitäkin saa sitten verottaa.

Russell Napier on fiksu äijä, ja nähtävästi sitä mieltä, että pääomien vapaa liikkuvuus länsimaissa tulee muuttumaan tulevaisuudessa vähemmän vapaaksi.. Tässä hyvä haastattelu, harmi että äänenlaatu hiukan huono ja äijällä on skottiaksentti, kannattaa silti  kuunnella:

https://www.macrovoices.com/1014-macrovoices-292-russell-napier-knock-on-effects-of-secular-inflation

[Hämeenlinnan Oraakkeli]

Moni valtio saa velkaantumisensa ihan sillä kurinn että rikkain 20% laitetaan maksamaan veroja. Tekisi melkein mieli ruveta spekuloimaan sillä että ovatko nämä salaliitot itsessään salaliitto jolla saadaan sumuverho sille, mitä oikeasti tehdään.

Niin, rikkaiden veroaste tulee varmaan nousemaan, mutta aika paljon heitäkin saa sitten verottaa.

Russell Napier on fiksu äijä, ja nähtävästi sitä mieltä, että pääomien vapaa liikkuvuus länsimaissa tulee muuttumaan tulevaisuudessa vähemmän vapaaksi.. Tässä hyvä haastattelu, harmi että äänenlaatu hiukan huono ja äijällä on skottiaksentti, kannattaa silti  kuunnella:

https://www.macrovoices.com/1014-macrovoices-292-russell-napier-knock-on-effects-of-secular-inflation

No ei sitä taloutta vuodessa tarvitse saada kuntoon. Talous 1% ylijäämäiseksi BKT:sta  niin  valtioiden velat laskevat muutamassa vuosikymmenessä siedettävälle tasolle. Demokraattiset teollisuusmaat saavat taloutensa kuntoon jos uskaltavat tehdö oikeita poliittisia päätöksiä. Suomen talous saataisiin kuntoon ihan sillä että laitettaisiin talouius kasvamaan.

[Dangr]

You will take cold showers.

https://www.weforum.org/videos/taking-cold-showers-can-make-you-less-likely-to-get-ill?collection=popular-video

[Aukusti Jylhä]

WEFn yhteistyökumppanit linkissä.

https://www.weforum.org/partners#search

Näitä on aivan jäätävä määrä, jotakuinkin kaikilla yhteiskunnan aloilla. Pitääpä vähän kaivella. Kaivelkaa tekin.

[Eagle]

You will take cold showers.

https://www.weforum.org/videos/taking-cold-showers-can-make-you-less-likely-to-get-ill?collection=popular-video

Tämähän oli asiallinen video.

[Ajatolloh]

You will take cold showers.

https://www.weforum.org/videos/taking-cold-showers-can-make-you-less-likely-to-get-ill?collection=popular-video

Tämähän oli asiallinen video.

Aikoinaan Lapissakin asumassa piipahtanutta Wim Hofia kannattaa kuunnella, jos tuo aihe immuniteetti ja kylmä kiinnostaa. Hän sitä opetti, itsekin kävin hänen opissa.

Samoin Hofilla oli omanlaisensa hengitystekniikka, jonka harjoittelua hän painotti. Tai siis painottaa varmaan edelleen, käsittääkseni äijä on edelleen hengissä. Asustelee kait takaisin kotimaassaan Hollannissa.

[Atte Saarela]

J. Edward Griffin pitää mahdollisena, että resetti johtaa suuriin muutoksiin Yhdysvalloissa ja jopa totalitarismiin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J54ze1TbgkA

On todella vaikea sanoa miten tässä oikeasti käy, mutta on oikeasti olemassa syitä, miksi monien länsimaiden talous voi lähivuosina hyvinkin ajautua melko isoihin ongelmiin, isompiin kuin mitä on nähty moneen vuosikymmeneen.

Tämä keskuspankkien ylläpitämä "elvytys" on kyllä lyhyellä tähtäimellä onnistunut lykkäämään talouskriisejä kauemmas ja kauemmas tulevaisuuteen ja mahdollistanut valtioiden lepsun rahankäytön, mutta kestävällä pohjalla tällainen politiikka ei ole.

Käytännössä inflaatio tulee todella asettamaan rajoja sille miten paljon enää voidaan "elvyttää", ja se on sitten mielenkiintoista nähdä mitä siitä seuraa.

Jos paha kriisi tulee, toivottavasti ihmiset osaavat syyttää siitä oikeaa tahoa, eli julkista sektoria ja keskuspankkeja, eikä "pahoja markkinavoimia". Näin ollen paras ratkaisu tulee olemaan vähemmän valtiota, ei enemmän valtiota. Tämän minä sanon erityisesti teille joiden mielestä tämä koko keskustelu koskee pelkkää naurettavaa salaliittoteoriaa, sillä teidän tulee olemaan sitä vaikein ymmärtää.

[Hämeenlinnan Oraakkeli]

Jos jokin hyperinflaatio iskee niin eiköhän todellinen syy ole energiakriisi, joka tulee aivan varmasti jossain mittakaavassa.  Kun fossiiliset kielletään, ja tilalle tarjotaan pelkästään tuulta ja aurinkopaneeleja, niin yhtälö ei vaan toimi. Sähköstä ja polttoaineista tulee pula, ja tuotannon pullonkaula.

[justustr]

Jos jokin hyperinflaatio iskee niin eiköhän todellinen syy ole energiakriisi, joka tulee aivan varmasti jossain mittakaavassa.  Kun fossiiliset kielletään, ja tilalle tarjotaan pelkästään tuulta ja aurinkopaneeleja, niin yhtälö ei vaan toimi. Sähköstä ja polttoaineista tulee pula, ja tuotannon pullonkaula.

Ei niitä fossiilisia kielletä eikä niiden tuotanto mihinkään lopu. Moderneilla yhteiskunnilla ei ole varaa vajota energiakriisiin, kuten ei myöskään öljyntuottajamailla ole varaa lopettaa öljyn pumppaamista. Kapitalismin parhautta on rahan ja materian himo, joka pitää rattaat pyörimässä.

[Dangr]

Lisää WEF:n videoita/näkemyksiä.
Nyt pakkanen vie tilit.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Wallstreetsilver/comments/r0ibjo/getting_the_masses_ready_to_own_nothing_i_see/

[Hämeenlinnan Oraakkeli]

Jos jokin hyperinflaatio iskee niin eiköhän todellinen syy ole energiakriisi, joka tulee aivan varmasti jossain mittakaavassa.  Kun fossiiliset kielletään, ja tilalle tarjotaan pelkästään tuulta ja aurinkopaneeleja, niin yhtälö ei vaan toimi. Sähköstä ja polttoaineista tulee pula, ja tuotannon pullonkaula.

Ei niitä fossiilisia kielletä eikä niiden tuotanto mihinkään lopu. Moderneilla yhteiskunnilla ei ole varaa vajota energiakriisiin, kuten ei myöskään öljyntuottajamailla ole varaa lopettaa öljyn pumppaamista. Kapitalismin parhautta on rahan ja materian himo, joka pitää rattaat pyörimässä.

Energiasta voi tulla pulaa ihan sillä että kivihiilivoimaloita ei rakenneta lisää tai korvata vanhentuneita. Tai jos tuulta ja aurinkoa tehdään liikaa ja iskee euroopanlaajuinen kylmä virtaus siperiasta.

[Dangr]

https://mobile.twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1470769172221210634

[tweet]1470769172221210634[/tweet]

Kuuluuko samaan poppooseen?

Näyttää ainakin keskustelleen asioista:
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/inter/date/2021/html/ecb.in210901_1~171c7b19d0.en.html

Lisäksi pari kuvaa. Inflaatiota lykkää, tuskin sentään hyperinflaatiota joka on wikin mukaan:

"Hyperinflaatioksi nimitetään tilannetta, jossa inflaatio nousee hillittömän korkeaksi. Määritelmä ei ole tarkka: kun Venäjällä oli 1990-luvulla Neuvostoliiton hajottua 40 prosentin kuukausittainen inflaatio (5 700 % vuodessa),[1] taloustieteilijät olivat eri mieltä siitä, onko kyseessä hyperinflaatio vai ei. Perussa Alan Garcían ensimmäisellä kaudella (1985–1990) inflaatio oli tuhansia prosentteja vuodessa ja maan valuutta vaihdettiin kahteen kertaan."

[Hämeenlinnan Oraakkeli]

Jos jokin hyperinflaatio iskee niin eiköhän todellinen syy ole energiakriisi, joka tulee aivan varmasti jossain mittakaavassa.  Kun fossiiliset kielletään, ja tilalle tarjotaan pelkästään tuulta ja aurinkopaneeleja, niin yhtälö ei vaan toimi. Sähköstä ja polttoaineista tulee pula, ja tuotannon pullonkaula.

Ei niitä fossiilisia kielletä eikä niiden tuotanto mihinkään lopu. Moderneilla yhteiskunnilla ei ole varaa vajota energiakriisiin, kuten ei myöskään öljyntuottajamailla ole varaa lopettaa öljyn pumppaamista. Kapitalismin parhautta on rahan ja materian himo, joka pitää rattaat pyörimässä.

Ja kuukausi eteenpäin niin sähkön hinta + 200%

[migri]

Intian maajussit sai pienen voiton.

"WOAH!!!" The Media Don't Want You To Know THESE PROTESTORS WON!!!"
Russell Brand

Indian farmers have achieved a victory in their year-long protests over corporate exploitation. With Bill Gates and big tech's assault on independent farming, what can this victory teach us all about how to fight authoritarianism and corporate greed?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3-22-oFYmQ

[Lalli IsoTalo]

Kardinaali Müller (former bishop of Regensburg): Soros, Gates, ja Schwab käyttävät pandemiaa syynä totaalisen kontrollin kähmiseen.

Cardinal Müller: Soros, Gates, and Schwab Using Pandemic to Gain "Total Control"

Robert Semonsen | 16.12.21

Cardinal Müller, former bishop of Regensburg, has condemned globalist financial elites, calling them individuals who view the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic as a window of opportunity to "implement their agenda."

Gerhard Ludwig Müller, a German cardinal who presently sits as a high-ranking Vatican court judge, has denounced prominent members of the globalist financial elite for exploiting the pandemic as a pretext to establish "total control" over the masses.

In a video recording* released by the St. Boniface Institute in Austria, Cardinal Müller condemned George Soros, Bill Gates, and Klaus Schwab, calling them individuals "who sit on the throne of their wealth" who view the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic as a window of opportunity to "implement their agenda," the German daily Die Welt reports.**

Policies pushed by the globalist financial elite, which have been presented to the public under the guise of combatting the worldwide pandemic, are "born out of the will to use the opportunity to bring people into line, to subject them to total control and to establish a surveillance state," Müller said, noting that times of crisis have always been ideal for anti-democratic activities.

* https://twitter.com/Inst_StBoniface/status/1467949581413535751
** https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article235631970/Corona-Verschwoerung-Kardinal-Mueller-befuerchtet-Ueberwachungsstaat-mit-totaler-Kontrolle.html

[Unown1]

[tweet]1472919920602140691[/tweet]
Kyseessä siis ei ole vuoto, vaan asiakirjat saatiin tietopyynnön kautta. Twiitin kirje löytyy Hollannin edustajainhuoneen sivuilta:
https://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstukken/kamervragen/detail?id=2021D50828&did=2021D50828
ja eka linkki Bijlagenin alta ja pdf:n sivu 17:
https://www.tweedekamer.nl/downloads/document?id=67726d85-37ca-49c9-a854-0874f460f4b0&title=Correspondentie%20World%20Economic%20Forum.pdf

[Urban Moving Systems]

Maailman talousfoorumin vuosittain järjestettävä kokous on peruttu koronan vuoksi ja siirretty pidettäväksi alkukesästä 2022.

Davos World Economic Forum called off due to COVID

"Current pandemic conditions make it extremely difficult to deliver a global in-person meeting."

The World Economic Forum (WEF) postponed until mid-2022 its annual meeting that had been due to take place in the Swiss mountain resort of Davos in January, the organizers said on Monday.

The event, a meeting point for the world's business and political leaders, has been postponed in light of continued uncertainty over the Omicron outbreak, it said, adding the meeting was now planned for "early summer."

"Current pandemic conditions make it extremely difficult to deliver a global in-person meeting. Preparations have been guided by expert advice and have benefited from the close collaboration of the Swiss government at all levels," the Geneva-based WEF said on its website.
...

https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-689244

[Lalli IsoTalo]

[tweet]1472919920602140691[/tweet]
Kyseessä siis ei ole vuoto, vaan asiakirjat saatiin tietopyynnön kautta. Twiitin kirje löytyy Hollannin edustajainhuoneen sivuilta:
https://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstukken/kamervragen/detail?id=2021D50828&did=2021D50828
ja eka linkki Bijlagenin alta ja pdf:n sivu 17:https://www.tweedekamer.nl/downloads/document?id=67726d85-37ca-49c9-a854-0874f460f4b0&title=Correspondentie%20World%20Economic%20Forum.pdf

Korostukset ja tekstit [hakasuluissa] minun. Tällaiset kirjeet Klaus Schwabs (WEF) on epäilemättä lähettänyt muillekin osallistujamaille, myös Suomeen, jonka pääministeri poseerasi Schwabs in kanssa.

Direct collusion [=salaliitto/juonittelu] between Klaus Schwabs WEF and
the Dutch Government on pushing The Great Reset

https://www.tweedekamer.nl/downloads/document?id=67726d85-37ca-49c9-a854-0874f460f4b0&title=Correspondentie%20World%20Economic%20Forum.pdf , sivu 17:

[Lähettäjä: World Econimic Forum]

[Vastaanottaja:] H E MrWopke Hoekstra
Minister of Finance
Ministry of Finance of the Netherlands

P 0 Box 20201
2500 EE The Hague
Netherlands
21 December 2020
saf pso

Dear Minister

Following up on my earlier invitation I would like to update you on the World Economic Forum Special Annual Meeting 2021 which will now take place In Singapore from 25 to 28 May 2021.

This will be the first global leadership summit in 2021 where leaders from government and business come together again in an atmosphere of trust ...

"Jälleen". Montako vuotta tämä salaliittoilu on jo jatkunut?

"Luottamuksen ilmapiiri" epäilemättä tarkoittanee äärisalassapitoa, jossa vain kansallisvaltioiden luottohenkilöt tietävät mitä WEF ja monikansalliset korporaatiot juonittelevat kansallisvaltioiden ja niiden pk-sektoreiden päiden menoksi.

...to design a common recovery path and rebuild a more resilient [/b][= kimmoisa / joustava / sitkeä / lannistumaton] cohesive [=    koossapitävä / koossapysyvä /tahmea] and sustainable [= kestävä / pysyvä / ympäristöä säästävä] society.[/size]

As you know Singapore has been successful in dealing with the pandemic and can be considered a safe destination The Forum is working closely with the Government of Singapore to make the Special Annual Meeting 2021 interactive and impactful and at the same time safe and healthy.

In view of the systemic impact of the pandemic on fiscal policy and public finances your views and those of the Netherlands would be crucial to shaping the future of the global financial system.

The Forum will contact your office to ensure that this engagement is of maximum value for you and the Dutch Government I truly look forward to welcoming you personalty in Singapore and wish you a happy and healthy holiday season.

Yours sincerely,

Ei mitään nähtävää täällä, hajaantukaa.

EDITtiä tyhty enemmän kuin jaksoin laskea.

[Dangr]

Vain vainoharhaa ja salaliittoteorioita...

What is the Great Reset - and how did it get hijacked by conspiracy theories?
By BBC Monitoring and BBC Reality Check
BBC News

Published24 June

A vague set of proposals from an influential organisation has been transformed by online conspiracy theorists into a powerful viral rallying cry. What is the truth behind the "Great Reset"?

Believers spin dark tales about an authoritarian socialist world government run by powerful capitalists and politicians - a secret cabal that is broadcasting its plan around the world.

Despite all the contradictions in the last sentence, thousands online have latched on to this latest reimagining of an old conspiracy theory - updated for the age of Covid.

https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-57532368

[Lalli IsoTalo]

Believers spin dark tales about an authoritarian socialist world government run by powerful capitalists and politicians - a secret cabal that is broadcasting its plan around the world https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-57532368

Kierros 1: Kansojen Liitto > epäonnistui, koska USA ei lähtenyt mukaan.
Kierros 2: Yhdistyneet Kansakunnat > epäonnistui, koska liikaa byrokratiaa ja päätösvallan hajautusta kansallisvaltioille.
Kierros 3: The Great Reset

Jos noista nimistä ei pysty päättelemään, että tarkoituksena on koko ajan ollut yhdistää kaikki kansat keskenään yhden maailmanhallituksen alaisuuteen, niin, noh, sitten ei vaan pysty.

Kaksi ensimmäistä yritystä epäonnistui, ja niin tulee epäonnistumaan tämä kolmaskin suuruudenhullu yritys. Koska ihmiset eivät ole onnellisia ydinajatukseen, jonka mukaan olet onnellinen, koska et omista mitään (=kommunismin ydinajatus pidemmälle vietynä), ja olet täydellisesti niiden varassa, jotka omistavat tai kontrolloivat.

Communist philosophy argues against private property and supports collective ownership.

[Vesa Heimo]

^Täytyy nyt toki muistaa että homma alkoi jo 1960- luvulla kun NBC alkoi esittää kommunistista propagandaa tv-utopialla nimeltä Star Trek. Siellä neukut, kinkit ja neekerit pyöri sulassa sovussa universuminparannushommissa yhdistämässä milloin mitäkin vieraslajia yhteiseen liittoumaan. Ja kellekkään ei maksettu palkkaa koska kaikille lopulta oli kaikkea.

Ylpeästi rotutietoisilla Klingoneillakin oli "loikkareita" jotka esitettiin sankareina eikä kansanpettureina.

Edelleen tätä hapatusta saa näyttää televisioissa uusintoina, ja uusia propagandavideoita tehdään jopa valkokankaalle yhä uudelleen ja uudelleen.

Kuka on tämän kaiken takana, kysyn vaan.

[Lalli IsoTalo]

^Täytyy nyt toki muistaa että homma alkoi jo 1960- luvulla kun NBC alkoi esittää kommunistista propagandaa tv-utopialla nimeltä Star Trek. Siellä neukut, kinkit ja neekerit pyöri sulassa sovussa universuminparannushommissa yhdistämässä milloin mitäkin vieraslajia yhteiseen liittoumaan. Ja kellekkään ei maksettu palkkaa koska kaikille lopulta oli kaikkea.

Ylpeästi rotutietoisilla Klingoneillakin oli "loikkareita" jotka esitettiin sankareina eikä kansanpettureina.

Edelleen tätä hapatusta saa näyttää televisioissa uusintoina, ja uusia propagandavideoita tehdään jopa valkokankaalle yhä uudelleen ja uudelleen.

Kuka on tämän kaiken takana, kysyn vaan.

Meinaatko, että tämä on Hollywoodin ja NBC:n ovela juoni maailmanhallituksen piilomarkkinoimiseksi ja valkokankaan katsojien aivopesemiseksi, transponoituna galaksiseen ympäristöön? Jos meinaat  , niin aika hyvin keksitty! 

^^^

Toisaalta, kyllähän sellaiset nerot kuten Waltari ja Orwell kirjoittivat omasta ajastaan ja ympäristöstään, mutta siirsivät tapahtuvat eri aikaan ja paikkaan.

[justustr]

^Täytyy nyt toki muistaa että homma alkoi jo 1960- luvulla kun NBC alkoi esittää kommunistista propagandaa tv-utopialla nimeltä Star Trek. Siellä neukut, kinkit ja neekerit pyöri sulassa sovussa universuminparannushommissa yhdistämässä milloin mitäkin vieraslajia yhteiseen liittoumaan. Ja kellekkään ei maksettu palkkaa koska kaikille lopulta oli kaikkea.

Ylpeästi rotutietoisilla Klingoneillakin oli "loikkareita" jotka esitettiin sankareina eikä kansanpettureina.

Edelleen tätä hapatusta saa näyttää televisioissa uusintoina, ja uusia propagandavideoita tehdään jopa valkokankaalle yhä uudelleen ja uudelleen.

Kuka on tämän kaiken takana, kysyn vaan.

Jutkut tietysti. Star Trekin jutkuudesta todisteita mm. täältä:
https://ohiovalley.nfty.org/2016/11/03/the-jewish-side-of-star-trek/

Since Star Trek has so many Jewish themes, there are obviously many Jews within the franchise.  Most notably, Leonard Nimoy (Spock) and William Shatner (Captain Kirk) were and still are members of the tribe.  The lead writers of The Original Series (1966-1969), Bob Justman and Herb Solow are Jewish too (now it makes sense why Star Trek is so Jewish).  Other Jewish names in the world of Star Trek that are recognizable would be: Walter Koenig (Chekov, The Original Series), Brent Spiner (Data, The Next Generation), and  Armin Shimmerman (Quark, Deep Space Nine).

[Atte Saarela]

Ron Paul pohtii Yhdysvaltojen alijäämäpolitiikan seurauksia.

Tämä voi olla jossain vaiheessa relevanttia myös Euroopassa.. Jos inflaatio muodostuu vakavaksi ongelmaksi euroalueellakin, on tärkeää, että ihmiset ymmärtävät, että syypää ei ole esim. pahat riistokapitalistit, vaan epäonnistunut raha- ja energiapolitiikka. Tällaisia ongelmia ei ratkaista valtion taholta tapahtuvan sääntelyn tai rahankäytön lisäämisellä, vaan pikemminkin niitä pitää rankasti karsia.

https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/crack-boom-here

Recent polls show Americans expect continued large price increases. This indicates we may be on the verge of what Ludwig von Mises called a "crack-up boom." A crack-up boom occurs when the general population realizes that constant currency depreciation is a feature, not a bug, of central banking. This leads people to seek alternatives to government-issued currency and to factor rising prices into their plans. The crack-up boom will likely extend overseas as more countries reject the dollar's world reserve currency status. This rejection will be driven by a combination of concern over America's growing debt and resentment of America's hyper-interventionist foreign policy.

Crack-up booms have historically facilitated the growth of authoritarian political movements. However, this is not inevitable. If those of us who know the truth spread the ideas of liberty to enough people, we may be able to move through the crack-up boom to a rebirth of liberty, peace, and prosperity. Steps in this direction include convincing Congress to cut spending, legalize competing currencies, and end the Fed.

[zupi]

Muisteluja vajaan parin vuoden takaa. Voinee valottaa myös sitä, miksi koronapasseja ajetaan nyt väkisin joka paikkaan, vaikkei siinä ole pandemian kannalta mitään järkeä. Voi heittää tarvittaessa koronarajoitusten ylilyönnit ketjuun, mutta itse näkisin, että asia varsinaisesti liittyy tämän ketjun aiheeseen.

https://norberthaering.de/en/power-control/wef-ktdi-2-en/ (11.4.2020)

Money and more
Blog by Norbert Häring

The Totalitarian Dystopia of the World Economic Forum is Becoming Reality

In January  2018, a pilot project for the surveillance of air travelers, commissioned by the World Economic Forum, was agreed upon in Davos. At the time, I presented the Known Traveller Digital Identity (KTDI) project as a "totalitarian dystopa". A follow-up report shows that the multinational corporations are successfully involving governments and the EU in their plans. Covid-19 is speeding up implementation tremdendously and Bill Gates inadvertently lets us know how.


Like the 2018 report called ,,"The Known Traveller: Unlocking the potential of digital identity for secure and seamless travel" this more technical KTDI White Paper that goes by the title "Known Traveller Digital Identity Specifications Guidance" was published without any fanfare on the Internet  in March. These reports, prepared by the consulting firm Accenture, are meant to be read only by people in the digital surveillance and security business. For understandable reasons, these people prefer to talk about digital identity rather than digital control or surveillance.

This is how the KTDI-scheme is supposed to work: We upload information about us into a database – or authorize others to do so. First of all, this should be a proof of identity from the authorities, but also our travel history, bank data, hotel accommodations, rental car bookings, documents from universities, government offices and much more. If we want to cross a border, we give the authorities access to this database in advance, so that they can see beforehand that we are harmless. Using facial recognition and our (ideally) biometrically linked smartphone, they can recognize us at the border crossing. If we have been diligent enough in providing data, we will be allowed to walk past the queues of other travellers, receiving preferential treatment and minimal checks. However, as it says in the first KTDI-report, if there should be any doubt as to a traveller's intentions, the border official can, on the basis of the information provided in advance, ask the respective person more in-depth questions, for example ,,to better understand his recent activities".

One can easily imagine how "voluntary" this data release will be once the system is established. (...)

The border authorities are simply the ideal catalyst for a global system of citizen-assisted mass surveillance and data sharing, gradually involving all the world's governments. Once the US and a few other large countries take part in that scheme, the citizens of a country whose government refuses to participate will have great difficulty travelling internationally.

Once all governments will have signed up to this standard for the forced voluntary exchange of data with citizens, it is envisioned that we will also be allowed to hand over our data in everyday interactions with companies and authorities. In both reports, health, education, banking, humanitarian aid and elections are the areas mentioned.

A global, totalitarian system

The KTDI White Paper makes clear the great ambition of the project in its conclusions:

    This paper outlines the ambition for KTDI to provide the foundations for a globally accepted decentralized identity ecosystem. Further development and wider adoption depend on maximizing data exchange interoperability and federated trust. Success will rest upon cooperation between world governments, regulators, the aviation industry, technology providers and other players to establish global standards and specifications for compliance by all stakeholders.

The conditions for enforcing this global surveillance standard are excellent. The Known Traveller project uses technical standards for verifiable credentials and decentralized identifiers as they are currently being developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) . W3C is the most important standards-setting body for the Internet and is dominated by US-American Internet and telecommunications companies.

W3C's members overlap strongly with those of the Decentralized Identity Foundation, which multinationals such as Microsoft and many smaller companies in the digital security industry have founded to advance global identity control standards. The companies that make up this group often have very close ties to the intelligence community. US Homeland Security has been involved in the Know Traveller project from the beginning. At the relevant digital identity forums, representatives of companies of the digital identity and security industries mingle with representatives of all the relevant security and intelligence agencies.

Forced voluntariness

The trick is the fiction of voluntariness, the explicit, if extorted, consent to the use of data, which you have to give every time you want to receive a government service in this system or if you just want to pay anything digitally. This is similar to what happens to you if you move around the World Wide Web today. You constantly have to voluntarily agree to monitoring requests of the website operators or simply choose to stay away.

The envisaged global system has a particularly pernicious aspect, which makes a mockery of the oft-advertized autonomy and control of those who supposedly own their data:

    Identity attributes are attested to and provided by issuing authorities (i.e. passport number, bank details. An issuing authority may also revoke a VC (virtual credential) that it had previously issued by updating the blockchain-based cryptographic accumulator accordingly..

Imagine what it will look like when this system is implemented as intended throughout the world, in every country, however repressive. Let us assume that the abolition of cash – which is being driven forward in parallel by more or less the same group of corporations and agencies – is successfully completed. For everything you want to do or pay, you depend on there being a tick in the right places in the database on you. If you fall out of favor with your own government, it might remove the tick from your identity information and screw you, even if you are not in the country. Your bank can do the same.

(...)

If the US government or the algorithms controlled by its agencies have someone in the world in their sights, they can do the same thing. Either they get the respective government or banks to invalidate all digital documents of the target person, or the US internet corporations that control the system can do so, or the private US credit rating agencies slash the credit rating.

Much of this is already possible today and being done, though not frequently to individuals. But the system will only be comprehensive and perfect when there is a globally accepted technical standard that allows access to all these data and documents from anywhere. Only then will Washington (or rather Fort Meade and Langley) be able to control from their home computers everyone in every participating corner of the world. At the same time, national authoritarian governments will be able to control everyone in their own sphere of influence, whether they are at home or abroad.

This is the agenda behind the intense work that USAID, Gates and the World Economic Forum are doing, with the help of a dependent UN, to create digital identities for every person on the globe. They are working through ID4Africa, ID2020 and a dozen more such initiatives and consortia with ID in their names. (More on this soon in a follow-up post.)

Minority Report reloaded

Everybody can then be led by a normally unnoticeable nose-ring. It might get rudely pulled at, though, even if you didn't do anything at all, just because an algorithm concludes that you are a type that, statistically, might cause trouble soon, like in the movie "Minority Report". The ambition to get there is documented in the first KTDI report of the World Economic Forum with a highlighted quote from Google manager Rob Torres:

    Technology companies have made major strides in data mining, machine learning and artificial intelligence enabling enhanced predictive analytics. In combination with passenger-provided information, these technologies can be used by governments to ... analyse complex patterns in big data with the goal of predicting border security risks.

The quote makes it clear that digital identity is not simply about giving everyone an easy way to prove who you are by means of a digital birth certificate or digital ID card, as they try to make us believe. If you are not yet convinced, here is another quote, taken from the "EU blockchain observatory report on digital identity and blockchain":

    When we say digital identity, we have to understand it as the sum of all the attributes that exist about us in the digital world, a constantly growing and evolving collection of data points.

Thus, digital identity means everything digitally storeable that there is to know about us, our actions and our preferences. It is about feeding everything known about a person into a database that can be tapped by all participating corporations and governments and manipulated by them at any time. Such that the corporations can steer us as consumer cattle into the right corral and fleece each of us individually and optimally, and have us as undemanding and obedient workhorses. It is about the governments and the corporations being able to detect anyone early on, who might want to break out of the system or break the system.

Remarkably, the World Economic Forum claims that it has not yet come up with a concept for the governance of this global totalitarian control infrastructure, i.e. who should be at the controls of this system. The White Paper says:

    Work on the definition and development of an appropriate governance framework for the KTDI concept continues and will be addressed in a future report.

In other words, governments are supposed to commit themselves to this concept without it being clear who will pull the strings. In reality, of course, it is clear enough. It is Washington and the big US corporations, directly or through international bodies such as the World Economic Forum, W3C, FATF and many more, which they dominate. If you have any doubt about the ambition of the World Economic Forum to rule the world I suggest reading the following:

The World Economic Forum is slowly taking over the UN (7.7.2019)
https://norberthaering.de/en/power-control/wef-un-2/

Governments and the UN have fallen in line

Nevertheless, governments and a UN dependent on corporate money seem quite eager to participate in this global surveillance system developed by multinational corporations and the US Homeland Security. It is marketed by participating companies in the security and identity industry under the euphemistic name Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI).

In Brussels, this term, SSI, is taking hold. The European Economic and Social Committee, an EU body in which employers' associations, trade unions and other interest groups are supposed to represent "organised civil society", has developed a European Self-Sovereign Identity Framework (eSSIF). It is almost one-to-one the dystopia described in the reports of the World Economic Forum.

(...)

Covid-19 speeds things up a lot

(...)

In a video interview of March 24, the second richest and probably most powerful man in the world is interviewed by TED moderator Chris Anderson about the US corona strategy. In his usual relaxed power pose, Bill Gates talks as if he were President of the United States or head of the UN. The interview becomes particularly interesting when Gates comes to the presumed immunity of people who have already recovered from an infection. Gates links this to the issue of how and when travel restrictions can be eased by saying:

    Eventually we will have to have a certificate of who is a recoverd person, who is a vaccinated person, because you don't want to have people moving around the world where you have some countries, that won't have it under control, sadly. You don't want to completely block of the abilty of those people to go and come back and move around.

And then comes the doubly interesting sentence:

    So eventually there will be this sort of digital immunity proof, that will help facilitate the global re-opening up.

The latter sentence is doubly interesting because of the word "digital" and because the sentence is only contained in a slightly longer version of the video that someone has uploaded to preserve it. In the official TED video this one sentence was cut out (at minute 34:27) . According to the comments under the longer video, this happened in the afternoon of March 31st. This is astonishing, because the second half of the sentence about the reopening of the borders is actually a very good conclusion ot this topic, before the interviewer asks the next question. One would not cut it out for journalistic reasons. To cut it out for brevity, would not make much sense, because it is only two or three seconds long and the cut is noticeable.

It was presumably the word "digital" that was to be removed. For it invites questions that ultimately lead to all what makes up the Known Traveller program. In what is left in the official video, Gates speaks only of a certificate. This invites the following understanding of what he is talking about: Only those who have an immunity certificate from a health authority can book a flight, and only those who can produce it can board a plane and get through immigration. That would be quite easy to implement and relatively unproblematic.

Having the certificate in a digital version sounds more practical, because it would be faster and easier. But if a digital immunity proof for international travel is to be globally (machine-)usable, it needs a global standard for the certificate, a storage location for the certificates that is considered secure and generally accessible, a standard for data exchange that works everywhere, and a global standard for certifying the authenticity of a digital proof. The Known Traveller Program, which is being driven by the US Homeland Security and the World Economic Forum, wants to develop and implement all of this. Bill Gates is one of the most influential members of the World Economic Forum, if not the most influential.

(...)

Thanks to Covid-19, the Brave New World is taking shape much more quickly than anyone would have thought only three months ago. And thanks to Covid-19, many or even most people would currently  find such totalitarian power desirable. Covid-19 is a heaven-sent gift for the World Economic Forum's plans.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norbert_H%C3%A4ring

Norbert Häring is an economist and business journalist. Since 2002 he has reported on finance and economics for the German business newspaper Handelsblatt.[1]

He is the author (with Olaf Storbeck) of the book Ökonomie 2.0 which was a bestseller in Germany and won the 2007 GetAbstract International Book Award for best business book.[2] It was published in English as Economics 2.0 and also translated into Chinese, Korean, Italian and Japanese.[3] His book Markt und Macht was published in English as Economists and the Powerful (with Niall Douglas) by Anthem Press in 2012.[4] In a review for CounterPunch, economist Michael Hudson wrote that the authors "provide a wealth of references tracing how economics was turned into a propaganda exercise for financiers, landlords, monopolists, insiders, fraudsters and other rent-seeking predators."[5]

Häring serves as non-voting chairman for the Shadow ECB Council, a group of 15 economists drawn from banks, academia, and other institutions founded in 2002 to discuss monetary policy and make recommendations to the European Central Bank.[1] He is a co-founder and co-director of the World Economics Association and co-editor of the journal World Economic Review, both of which aim to promote a pluralistic approach to economic research.[6]

In 2014 he was awarded the Keynes Prize for Economic Writing for his contributions to Handelsblatt.[7]

[Nikolas]

Lainaan pitkähkön pätkän zupin lainauksesta edellä, jotta konteksti pysyy mukana:

In a video interview of March 24, the second richest and probably most powerful man in the world is interviewed by TED moderator Chris Anderson about the US corona strategy. In his usual relaxed power pose, Bill Gates talks as if he were President of the United States or head of the UN. The interview becomes particularly interesting when Gates comes to the presumed immunity of people who have already recovered from an infection. Gates links this to the issue of how and when travel restrictions can be eased by saying:

    Eventually we will have to have a certificate of who is a recoverd person, who is a vaccinated person, because you don't want to have people moving around the world where you have some countries, that won't have it under control, sadly. You don't want to completely block of the abilty of those people to go and come back and move around.

And then comes the doubly interesting sentence:

    So eventually there will be this sort of digital immunity proof, that will help facilitate the global re-opening up.

The latter sentence is doubly interesting because of the word "digital" and because the sentence is only contained in a slightly longer version of the video that someone has uploaded to preserve it. In the official TED video this one sentence was cut out (at minute 34:27) . According to the comments under the longer video, this happened in the afternoon of March 31st. This is astonishing, because the second half of the sentence about the reopening of the borders is actually a very good conclusion ot this topic, before the interviewer asks the next question. One would not cut it out for journalistic reasons. To cut it out for brevity, would not make much sense, because it is only two or three seconds long and the cut is noticeable.

It was presumably the word "digital" that was to be removed. For it invites questions that ultimately lead to all what makes up the Known Traveller program. In what is left in the official video, Gates speaks only of a certificate. This invites the following understanding of what he is talking about: Only those who have an immunity certificate from a health authority can book a flight, and only those who can produce it can board a plane and get through immigration. That would be quite easy to implement and relatively unproblematic.

Having the certificate in a digital version sounds more practical, because it would be faster and easier. But if a digital immunity proof for international travel is to be globally (machine-)usable, it needs a global standard for the certificate, a storage location for the certificates that is considered secure and generally accessible, a standard for data exchange that works everywhere, and a global standard for certifying the authenticity of a digital proof. The Known Traveller Program, which is being driven by the US Homeland Security and the World Economic Forum, wants to develop and implement all of this. Bill Gates is one of the most influential members of the World Economic Forum, if not the most influential.

Mielenkiintoista on tuon käytännön toteutus. Tarvitaan jokin sellainen tunniste, joka luotettavasti pysyy ihmisen mukana, ja jonka lukeminen myös sujuu nopeasti ja luotettavasti. En keksi mikä muu se olisi kuin ihon alle tuikattava RFID, mutta onhan tietenkin mahdollista että jotain muutakin on kehitteillä, vaikka en nyt heti osaa arvata mitä se muu voisi olla.

[Kontrolliryhmä]

Aika hämmentäväähän se on että yhtäkkiä joka ikiseen EU-maahan tuli rokotepassit käyttöön, vaikka esimerkiksi meillä pääministeri oli linjannut vain muutama kuukausi aiemmin ettei sellaisia todellakaan ole meille tulossa.

Selvä merkki ylhäältä päin ohjailusta.

[zupi]

(...)

Money and more
Blog by Norbert Häring

The Totalitarian Dystopia of the World Economic Forum is Becoming Reality
(...)
The World Economic Forum is slowly taking over the UN (7.7.2019)
https://norberthaering.de/en/power-control/wef-un-2/
(...)

Lainauksia tuosta Norbertin 2019 kirjoituksesta.

https://norberthaering.de/en/power-control/wef-un-2/

The World Economic Forum is slowly taking over the UN

The World Economic Forum (WEF) and the United Nations (UN) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding to intensify their cooperation. The UN seems embarrassed  – for good reason. It is another step in its self-disempowerment of the UN and another milestone for the club of multinationals on the way to its declared goal – world domination. Sounds exagerated? Read for yourself what the World Economic Forum is writing on the subject.

(...)

The World Economic Forum is a lobby of the 1000 largest multinational corporations calling itself "THE international organization for public-private cooperation". According to the WEF, the most important political business and other leaders of society are involved in determining global, regional and industry agendas. The agenda is set  by the 100 largest and most influential who contribute the most money. In all major countries, the forum has "hubs" in the largest cities, where the "global shapers" are networked with one another.

(...)

In the section titled "An Overview of the WEF's Perspective" it says clearly that the goal is to replace the UN- and nations-based system of global governance by one that the corporations like better:

    In its view, the World Economic Forum is the body best suited to develop a new framework for a post-United Nations-based system of international governance.

They think that de facto they have already grown in the role of leaders of world governance. This role just needs to be formalized:

    In WEF's view, multinational corporations, international civil society organizations, and larger developing countries have entered the space formerly held by the major Northern nation-states and the UN system.

Note that multinationals are mentioned first as the new most powerful group. This is no accident, as the WEF thinks:

    In the case of the MNCs, their effective reach as de facto global governance institutions has long surpassed the functioning of the UN system.  (...) MNCs and international CSOs need to be recognized in their own right as full Actors in the global governance system, not just as lobbyists to nation-states or international proponents of specific positions or solutions.

Corporations have become more powerful not only that international organizations, but also more powerful than national governments is the message (...)

The World Economic Forum calls on the leaders of the multinationals to stand up and demand a leading role in ruling the world:

    Corporate executives and international CSO leaders need to be self-conscious of their new global Actor role and not try to pretend or minimize, as they have done in the past, their leadership role in global governance.

True, they keep mentioning CSOs, or Civil Society Organisations, too. But the only powerful ones of these that come to mind are the like of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which are better thought of as extensions of the multinationals.

In the sub-chapter "The United Nations and the Private Non-State World" it is explicitly acknowledged that what the WEF envisages is not covered by the charter of the UN:

    The United Nation system has a role – albeit one not envisaged in the UN Charter – in  WEF's redesign of global governance.

Does that mean we are having a discussion about changes to the charter of the UN? Far from it. Instead we are having Memorandums of Understanding between the US and the WEF, which the UN is too ashamed of to even publish.

What is the role of the UN, according to the WEF and the multinational corporations for which it speaks. This role is to "give de facto recognition to the multi-stakeholder process" and decisions under the leadership of the corporations, a process that is characterized by informal "multi-stakeholder groups", "public-private-partnerships" and "coalitions of the willing and capable" or, to put it more bluntly, by the end of democracy as we know it.

(...)

[justustr]

Digitalisaatio on itsestään selvyys Suomen kaltaisessa kehittyneessä yhteiskunnassa, jossa tuottavuutta pitää jatkuvasti ja kiihtyvässä tahdissa kohottaa. Tietoturva on tietysti tärkeä asia, mutta siihen liittyvät uhat ei ole mikään peruste pysäyttää kehitystä. Uhat pitää tietysti ratkaista niin kuin on tehty tähänkin asti. Erilaiset ICT ratkaisut ovat avainasemassa terveydenhuollon tehostamisessa joka on Suomessa aivan välttämätön toimi - ja ajankohtainen teema näin aluevaalien alla. Pistin muuten ilolla merkille että Jani Mäkelä otti juuri digitalisaation esille aluevaalitentissä. Voisiko tuosta päätellä, ett persuissa ei pelätä great resettiä?

Noin muutoin, toisin kuin tästä ketjusta saa ymmärtää, sähköinen koronapassi toimii oikein hyvin. Se on käsittääkseni ensimmäinen kokonaan sähköisesti toimiva palvelu kun passin näkee omakannasta ja saa kopioitua eri päätelaiteisiin itse. Oma kanta on muutoinkin esimerkki sähköisestä palvelusta joka keventää terveydenhuollon kuormaa, kuten mm. sähköiset reseptien uusinnat. Tällaisia palveluja tarvitaan tietysti lisää.

[justustr]

Aika hämmentäväähän se on että yhtäkkiä joka ikiseen EU-maahan tuli rokotepassit käyttöön, vaikka esimerkiksi meillä pääministeri oli linjannut vain muutama kuukausi aiemmin ettei sellaisia todellakaan ole meille tulossa.

Selvä merkki ylhäältä päin ohjailusta.

Koronapassin idea on rajoittaa liikkumista eri maiden välillä. Siksi saattaa olla jopa järkevää ottaa passi käyttöön samaan aikaan niissä maissa joiden välistä liikkumista sillä aiotaan kontrolloida.