Yliopistolla on tutkittu maahanmuuton kustannuksia. Asian voi, näkökannasta riippuen, otsikoida hieman eri tavoin.
a) Daily Mail: Migrants from outside the EU have taken £120billion more from the state than they paid in taxes over 17 years (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2821151/Non-EU-migrants-State-costing-British-finances-120billion-1995.html)
b) University College London: Positive economic impact of UK immigration from the European Union: new evidence (https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/1114/051114-economic-impact-EU-immigration/)
Koko 51 sivuinen tutkimus löytyy täältä (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecoj.12181/abstract)
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/nov/05/eu-migrants-uk-gains-20bn-ucl-study (http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/nov/05/eu-migrants-uk-gains-20bn-ucl-study)
Guardian uutisoi tänään vain siirtolaisten tuomista hyödyistä.
Quote
UK gains £20bn from European migrants, UCL economists reveal
• Tax payments by European migrants far outweigh welfare
• Arrivals are better educated than British workforce
QuoteEuropean migrants to the UK are not a drain on Britain's finances and pay out far more in taxes than they receive in state benefits, a new study has revealed.
The research by two leading migration economists at University College also reveals that Britain is uniquely successful, even more than Germany, in attracting the most highly skilled and highly educated migrants in Europe.
The study, the Fiscal Impact of Immigration to the UK, published in the Economic Journal, reveals that more than 60% of new migrants from western and southern Europe are now university graduates. The educational levels of east Europeans who come to Britain are also improving with 25% of recent arrivals having completed a degree compared with 24% of the UK-born workforce.
It says that European migrants made a net contribution of £20bn to UK public finances between 2000 and 2011. Those from the original 15 EU countries, including France, Germany, Italy and Spain, contributed 64% – £15bn more in taxes than they received in welfare – while east European migrants contributed 12%, equivalent to £5bn more.
http://www.hs.fi/ulkomaat/a1415157370637
Hesari tapansa mukaan sumentaa täysin ja tahallisesti suomalaisille kerrottavan osuuden eikä sanallakaan mainitse mitään EU:n ulkopuolelta tulevien osuudesta tutkimuksessa:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2821151/Non-EU-migrants-State-costing-British-finances-120billion-1995.html
Kun puhutaan EU.sta tulevan maahanmuuton taloudellisista hyödyistä Iso-Britannialle, tulisi ottaa huomioon, että maahanmuutto ei ole riippuvaista vain EU-jäsenyydestä. Kyllä ihmisiä muuttaisi maahan ja maasta pois muutenkin. Mutta olisiko tällöin maahanmuuton taloudellinen hyöty nykyistä suurempi vai pienempi? Jos britit päästäisivät edelleen maahan halukkaat saksalaiset ja ruotsalaiset, mutta rajoittaisivat Bulgariasta tulevaa muuttoa, mikä olisi tilanne nykyiseen verrattuna?
En ole jaksanut lukea asiaa koskevaa uutisointia otsikkotasoa pidemmälle, mutta jotenkin epäilen, että tuo näkökulma loistaa poissaolollaan. Ainakin Hesarin jutussa.
Britannian etnistä katastrofia puidessa on aina syytä referoida seuraavaan paljastukseen:
QuoteThe Telegraph: Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser
Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed.
The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.
Critics said the revelations showed a "conspiracy" within Government to impose mass immigration for "cynical" political reasons.
Mr Neather was a speech writer who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, in the early 2000s.
Quote[...] "But ministers wouldn't talk about it. In part they probably realised the conservatism of their core voters: while ministers might have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, it wasn't necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working men's clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland."
He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote".
As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.
Koko juttu: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html
Britannian työväenpuolueella on hyvät mahdollisuudet voittaa seuraavat vaalit konservatiivien ja UKIP:n syödessä toisiltaan ääniä. Maan jokaisen työläisen tulisi lukea tästä. Työväenpuolueen johto on tietoisesti pettänyt äänestäjänsä ja muuttanut kuningaskunnan etnisen koostumuksen vain ja ainoastaan omien ideologisten tarkoitusperiensä vuoksi.