Kuulostaako tutulta?

[M.]

Käsitykseni siitä, mistä mokuttajat ovat oppinsa saaneet, sai vahvistusta lukiessani Ludwig von Misesin luentojen koostetta "Marxism unmasked: from delusion to destruction" (http://www.fee.org/pdf/books/MarxismUnmasked.pdf):

Socialism was already defeated intellectually at the time Marx wrote. Marx answered his critics by saying that those who were in opposition were only "bourgeois." He said there was no need to defeat his opponents' arguments, but only to unmask their bourgeois background. And as their doctrine was only bourgeois ideology, it was not necessary to deal with it. This would mean that no bourgeois could write anything in favor of socialism. Thus, all such writers were anxious to prove they were proletarians.

(Marx väitti, että jokaisella yhteiskuntaluokalla on oma logiikkansa. Tämä salli hänen myös kätevästi sivuuttaa saamansa kritiikin.)

Nyt siis tiedätte miksi razzea ei tarvitse kuunnella.

[o_O]

Tuntuu olevan lempisana tuo bourgeois, mitä tarkoittaa?

[Kowalski]

Tuntuu olevan lempisana tuo bourgeois, mitä tarkoittaa?

Porvaria tai porvaristoa.

[requiem]

Bourgeoisie is a classification used in analyzing human societies to describe a social class of people. Historically, the bourgeoisie comes from the middle or merchant classes of the Middle Ages, whose status or power came from employment, education, and wealth, as distinguished from those whose power came from being born into an aristocratic family of land owners. In modern times, it is the class owning the means for producing wealth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourgeoisie